Post Reading

The American Psychiatric Association (APA) and Other Mainstream Scientific Organizations Cannot Be Cited as a Reputable, Non-Biased Source

• 04 Mar, 2019
• |
• LGBT

To quote a friend of mine:

People don’t like being lied to or deceived. The American Psychiatric Association (APA) is still constantly cited in the courtrooms by homosexual activists. People need to learn that they were duped into believing the APA was a legitimate neutral scientific organization.

Respectfully, the APA cannot be cited as a neutral or scientific organization. It is an organization run by homosexual activists and has been since the 1970s. In 1973 the APA removed homosexuality from its list of disorders and did so not by any scientific means; only 1/4 of doctors voted — and militant homosexual activist groups continued to attack any psychiatrist or psychoanalyst who dared to present their findings as to the [mental disorder] of homosexuality before national or local meetings.

How Homosexual Activists Removed Homosexuality From the American Psychiatric Associations (APA) DSM List

and on Page 20 -28 here

Homosexuality Facts and Fiction

Mainstream psychiatry and psychology has been thoroughly compromised by homosexual activists and sympathizing ideologues.

‘Homosexuality’ was removed from the DSM list of disorders in 1973 as a result of homosexual activist coercion, bullying, and threats, and not based on any scientifically objective decisions. At this point, we can say the claim that “distant father-weak mother/weak father-distant mother/abuse/neglect with sensitive temperament” along with other similar environmental dynamic as the causes for homosexual inclinations wasn’t really debunked or refuted as homosexual activists claim. It was merely now “swept under a rug” with the changes that occurred here within these what are supposed to be scientific organizations.

“It was never a medical decision—and that’s why I think the action came so fast… It was a political move.” “That’s how far we’ve come in ten years. Now we even have the American Psychiatric Association running scared.” (Barbara Gittings, Homosexual/Lesbian Activist)

Here is lesbian activist Barbara Gittings admitting in an interview on video that it was homosexual activism, not science, that was responsible for the APA’s decision. See video between the 40 second and 50 second mark here.

At the 1978 annual APA (American Psychiatric Association) meeting, a formal structure was adopted for the Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Caucus of the American Psychiatric Association, which is now named the Association of Gay and Lesbian Psychiatrists (AGLP). In 1978, an official APA Task Force on Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Issues was established, which was given formal status as a standing committee in 1981. The following year the Assembly, APA’s legislative branch, approved adding elected representatives from a group initially designated as the Caucus of Homosexually Identified Psychiatrists, and later renamed the Caucus of Gay, Lesbian and Bisexual psychiatrists. The Caucus is still active in the APA Assembly.

Association of Gay and Lesbian Psychiatrist’s History

Association of Gay and Lesbian Psychiatrists – Wikipedia

See AGLP website. Right now on March 23, 2015, the AGLP website is not coming up. If they “scrubbed” the AGLP website from existence or it is not “up and running” for some reason, the above wikipedia link and the following Google search will show that it does (or at least did) exist. See here.

The homosexual activist caucus even has divisions set up throughout the country…

Society for the Psychological Study of Lesbian, Gay, Bi-sexual, and Transgender Issues

Since its founding, AGLP, with a membership of over 600 psychiatrists, has been active in helping to shape the dramatic conceptual shift in the cultural understanding and significance of homosexual behavior within psychiatry and within society. With the support of AGLP members, the APA has abandoned its own Leona Tyler principle and has issued political position statements supporting same sex unions and the adoption and co-parenting of children by same sex couples (APA Unanimously Supports Gay Marriage), as well as a position statement opposing “Reparative Therapy” as unethical,” which hasn’t been categorically proven. See here.

For more information, Dr. Jeffrey Satinover, a psychiatric, psychoanalyst, and physicist, also known for books on a number of topics in physics and neuroscience (see professional background here), was in the field at the time when all this was happening. he wrote about it in his book titled, “Homosexuality: The Politics of Truth,” see here and here, and a PDF that can be found online titled, “The Trojan Couch.” See here.

What Does the Research Show about Homosexual Practice?

When the ‘Foxes Are Guarding the Hen House. APA Task Force Members are mostly homosexual activists. See here.

APA task force members like homosexual activist Jack Drescher are unabashed and unapologetic about injecting ACTIVISM into and using it to influence the field of psychiatry.

Nothing objectively scientific or neutral here folks. Any APA- accredited therapist who specializes in issue of ‘gender’ and ‘sexuality’ is nothing but an ideologue promoting the homosexual activist bias.

Association of Gay and Lesbian Psychiatrist’s History

Based on this evidence, it’s important to point out that the American Academy of Pediatrics cannot be trusted either, because it simply gets all their info and policy statements about homosexuality from the APA. Within the following link, see bottom of the page…

Official Statement Concerning Homosexuality from the American Academy of Pediatrics

The American Medical Association (AMA) also has homosexual activists on their board of directors/advisory committee…

Homosexual Activist Caucus Advisory Committee within the AMA

The American Sociological Association (ASA) also has a  homosexual activist caucus…

See also here and here.

American Sociological Association

In London, there exists the APA equivalent called the Royal College of Psychiatrists (RCP).

They too have a homosexual ACTIVIST caucus (see here).

Even the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

includes a homosexual activist caucus called the National Organization of Gay and Lesbian Scientists and Technical Professionals (NOGLSTP) that dubs itself “a professional society that ‘educates’ and ADVOCATES for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer students and professionals in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics.” See here.

American Association of Christian Counselors: A Sham and a Shame…

http://www.psychoheresy-aware.org/aacc_sham.html

http://www.psychoheresy-aware.org/aacc_sham_2.html

http://www.psychoheresy-aware.org/aacc_sham_3.html

It appears as though MERCK also has a homosexual activist caucus (Rainbow Alliance) on its board of directors too.

“Willie Deese, President, Merck Manufacturing Division, serves as board member of North Carolina A&T State University. He was recognized by Merck’s Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) Community in 2012 for his advocacy for inclusion, diversity and LGBT rights at Merck. Willie also serves as the executive sponsor for Merck’s Veteran’s employee business-resource group.”

That represents a direction towards a political agenda. The scientific community (Medical, Psychology, etc) should not become political caucuses.

(It appears all MAINSTREAM medical and scientific organizations have been infiltrated and compromised with leftist think tanks, ideology, and their political agendas)

http://www.merckresponsibility.com/focus-areas/employees/diversity-inclusion/

http://www.merck.com/about/views-and-positions/home.html

Isn’t it a big contradiction when a group of people inject their private bedroom habits into so many different public fields and institutions while rhetorically asking others who may be concerned “why do they care about their private bedroom habits?” And isn’t not only another contradiction but disingenuous to claim that having a biblical view of marriage and sexuality exempts one from non-bias as you put forth sources that can be accussed of the same but from the opposite end?

As you can see, mainstream medical and psychological organizations have been thoroughly infiltrated and politicized by leftist think-tanks with emphasis on homosexual activism.

See how the APA plays a role in deception, lies, and half-truths about so-called “sexual orientation” (see here), and the right of individual self-determination to pursue therapy for unwanted same sex attractions (see here).